Cheng Mo: Take stock of Kirk's extreme remarks and the shooting motives
Original Cheng Mo Vision of the World September 13, 2025 12:10
Morning mist / Reposted
="mp" data-source="innerLink" href="https://www.toutiao.com/article/7549099562925834752/" rel="noopener noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">""Foresight Talk" article mentions the American political star who was assassinated on September 10Charlie Kirk,As a core ally of Trump and an icon of the MAGA movement, he has long exacerbated social divisions in American society with an extremely conservative stance and inflammatory narrative. This statement has been questioned by some readers. Although I highly suspect that they are Huachuan fans, I am still willing to make a public response to these questions to keep them straight and avoid readers thinking that I am just like Trump.
Kirke often publicly defends gun violence and even beautifies gun-related crimes - please note the difference. Asserting legal right to hold a gun does not mean that it is necessary to defend gun crimes, or even beautify gun-related crimes. "It's worth killing some people every year so that we can have the right to the Second Amendment," Kirk said. He even posted a gun picture on X platform with the caption "Guns save lives." When he made these extreme remarks, he thought about how sad and angry the families of the victims who were shot.
Kirke often spreads extreme racial discrimination and xenophobic remarks, tearing apart American society. He openly questioned the professional abilities of black pilots, suggesting that they were given jobs only because of the airline's "diversity, equity and inclusive goals." Such remarks are seen by civil rights organizations as a systematic derogatory to the African-American community. Kirk also posted on X platform: "Blacks attack white people three times more frequently than white people attack black people", but the data has not been confirmed by authoritative agencies and has been criticized by scholars as "creating racial panic."
He advocates restricting Muslim immigration and linking Islam with "barbaric demons", saying that "massacre in the name of Islam" is a threat to civilization. This remark has exacerbated the stigma of the Muslim community. Of course I know that on the Simplified Chinese Internet, most of them hold the same position, regardless of left, center and right, and I dare not say a word. But in most countries around the world, this is definitely racial discrimination and religious discrimination speech.
(Kirke spreads extreme right-wing rhetoric and becomes "Internet celebrity")
It would be a big mistake to think that Kirk is just to support the Jews. As a white supremacist, Kirk also attacks the Jews. Kirk once accused the Jewish community of "inciting hatred against white people" without any basis and was listed as "new anti-Semitism" by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).
Kirke also objectifies the social value of women, publicly claiming that women in their 30s are “no longer in their best condition” and are not suitable for dating, simplifying the value of women to age and fertility. Such remarks sparked condemnation from the widespread gender equality group. Kirk also hated and stigmatized transgender groups. In the Q&A session before being shot, Kirk claimed that "there are too many mass shootings that trans people have participated in in the past decade", a baseless allegation that has been regarded as "dangerous violent incitement" by many media and social organizations.
Kirke also demonized the liberal camp and political rivals, calling former Vice President Harris a "communist Kamara" and stigmatized the Democratic Party as a "murder party." This extreme hate speech made the MAGA movement supporters excited, but it tore apart American society.
Kirke also promoted the "Professor Watch List" project, specifically exposing the so-called "radical scholars", suppressing liberal teachers by revealing personal information and academic views, and is regarded by the academic community as a "McCarthyist cultural cleansing."
Of course, for Chinese fans and MAGA supporters, Kirk spreading these hatred remarks that tear apart American society is what they call "return to common sense." Just as they worship Trump and Vance, and just as many of us shout every day that we will destroy this one today and that one tomorrow, they think it is natural - they praise the jungle society where the strong prey on the weak and they will eventually be hunted. However, I must say that this runs contrary to the direction of human civilization development and is incompatible. Whether it is the dead Kirk, the living Trump and Vance, they only have their own interests in their eyes, without the slightest fairness or justice.
(The new and old flag bearers of the MAGA movement are closely interacting)
Kirke also spread a large amount of hate speech during the Russian-Ukrainian war issue, openly assisting the evil. Let's take a look at the "martyrs" and "rational moderates" in the eyes of this Huachuan fan. On the issue of the Russian-Ukrainian war, what they say "common sense" they always say -The position on the Russian-Ukrainian issue is definitely a touchstone for testing civilization and barbarism, justice and evil.
Kirke, like Trump, attributed the blame for the Russian-Ukrainian war to Ukrainian President Zelensky and U.S. President Biden. He claimed that Zelensky was a "CIA puppet" of the Biden administration, accusing him of dragging the Ukrainian people into "unnecessary massacre." Kirk has repeatedly criticized Ukrainian President Zelensky in public, calling him an "ungrateful and willful child" and "hindering the peace process."
He has repeatedly publicly opposed the United States' provision of weapons to Ukraine, believing that this would intensify conflict rather than promote peace. He claimed in his 2025 speech: "Zelensky would rather let the Ukrainians shed blood than accept the peace conditions of Russia because he is backed by Western forces." He also openly colluded with the Kremlin, saying that "Zelensky is an illegal president" and cannot represent Ukraine.
Kirke publicly supports Russia's sovereignty over Crimea, insisting that "Crimea is always a part of Russia" and believes that "it should not be handed back to Ukraine at all." He said in an interview with the New York Times in 2024: "After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the issue of ownership of Crimea has never been truly resolved, and it is unrealistic for Ukraine to try to retake it through force."
In addition, he also called on the United States to resume dialogue with Russia and gradually restore relations with Russia, believing that "considering Russia as a permanent enemy is a continuation of Cold War thinking."
Information source: 2025-08-13 WeChat official account Vision of the World
ID: yjss-307
[Statement] This article is a forwarding and sharing, and the source has been indicated. It does not mean that this platform agrees with or opposes the views of the original author. The responsibility and copyright belong to the original author. This article is reproduced for the purpose of conveying more information. If there is any infringement, please contact us to delete it.
