After 48 hours of shooting, the murderer was still at large. The FBI had no clues. Trump's favorite general died in vain?

The president's favorite general was assassinated in public for 48 hours, but the case progressed almost zero. The murderer is still out of order, and the FBI, which has no clue to solving the case, has been seriously questioned in the United States.

One ​​person's death opens Pandora's box. The American political arena is becoming increasingly torn, and the chaotic era of "drawing guns and shooting each other" may begin in the future.

As of September 12, 2025, Beijing time, it has been 48 hours since the death of Charlie Kirk, a favorite general under Trump and a right-wing social activist. However, a series of chain reactions brought about by the case are still fermenting.

The first thing that was hit by public criticism was the FBI, who showed his incompetence in this case. Because two days passed, the FBI did not make any progress in solving a series of case elements such as the murderer's traces, background, and assassination motive.

Speaking of which, they are not unwilling to work hard, but because the key information is clueless, the results achieved by the FBI's efforts are all "counter-effects".

For example, on the day of the shooting, the FBI quickly launched an attack and immediately arrested a man named George Zinn. However, after some verification, the police found that the so-called suspect not only had no motive for crime, but also judging from the information obtained by the police, this person is not only not the murderer at all, but also has nothing to do with the gunman.

So, the FBI had to give up. The director personally came forward to clarify the misunderstanding, and after admitting that he had caught the wrong person, he honestly let him go.

The low-energy and inefficient FBI quickly aroused dissatisfaction among the American public. The left-wing forces mocked madly with the mentality of "watching the fun". The right wing lost a general and had nowhere to vent his anger, so he could only "find another way" and scolded the FBI online.

Speaking of which, what the American public vented was not considered an unknown fire. After all, a nationally renowned politician was assassinated during a public campus event, and the law enforcement agency could not even provide decent clues. How could this manifestation make ordinary people feel relieved and not worry about their own security?

From this perspective, the FBI deserves to be scolded.

Secondly, Trump himself, who lost his beloved general after the shooting, took the lead in charge in the public opinion field and directly pointed the gun at the so-called "radical leftist" in his mouth."

As early as the night of the incident, Trump made a series of statements on social media by uploading videos.

At that time, Trump accused him of naming, "The radical left compared Americans as good as Charlie to the Nazis, but in fact, they were the bloodiest and cruelest murderers."

Objectively speaking, the confidant general was killed in public, and Trump was so sad, hated, and even publicly shouted and shouted for killing. This is understandable.

But when even the suspect's identity was not determined, it was too arbitrary to blame the words and deeds of the so-called "radical left" and suspected of "igniting" American public opinion to fight each other.

Sure enough, as Kirk's death continued to ferment, Trump personally came to the stage to fuel the fire, and a "grand event" of the full war between the left and right factions appeared in the US public opinion field.

On the one hand, because the one who was shot dead was the young opinion leader of the right wing camp. Therefore, the fans and supporters of the left-wing Americans fell into a carnival of "not knowing what the world is."

Now the American Internet is full of vicious jokes about the death of Charlie Kirk. Left-wing netizens took "memories" and attacked everywhere on major American portals. When they saw the right-wing, they mocked each other and started a series of verbal wars on the forum.

On the other hand, it seems that it was stimulated by Kirk's death, and the right-wing supporters in the United States were even more crazy.

They were so angry that they began to openly post long articles on their personal social media, just to whitewash the notorious right-wing forces in history such as the German Nazis and the Klan, and to completely transform into a scheming person. American public opinion has started a big fight.

So, in addition to endless quarrels and attacks and blame each other, what impact will Kirk's death have on the future of the United States?

Democracy is dead. This is a conclusion given by George Parker, a columnist at the Atlantic Monthly and American political critic.

In addition, he also said that Kirk died because of "freedom of speech". His death was a trampling on the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. The murderer trampled on the justice and took away everything that all American democrats cherished.

Authentic, after the case, the Democratic and Republican parties united quite rarely to mourn the dead and condemn the murderer.

But is this useful in quelling the public opinion storm caused by Kirk's death? Obviously useless. Because the contradictions and anger accumulated over the years between the two major camps of the United States "right and left" have been completely ignited.

It can be predicted that the future American politics will become more and more chaotic. If the US government does not intervene or stop it, it is not surprising that the future American politics is filled with more and more hatred and killing.