Two forward aces at the same peak: Haaland pulled the "goal" to the extreme, and Mbappe pulled the "creation" to the full range. The former is like a harvester, which does not touch many balls but can see blood; the latter is like an engine, which can protrude, shoot, and feed cakes. Who is better able to fight? Don’t rely on impression flow. Let’s clearly define these hard indicators such as appearance, goals, assists and per-game manufacturing, and then put them back to the game context and tell the truth (the total data comes to foreign media statistics. The data of the club and the national team comes from the German transfer market, so the data will be different).

Haland vs Mbappe | Who can play better?

total data

Haland: 337 games, 310 goals, 63 assists → Average goals 0.92, Average assists 0.19, Average production 1.11

Mbappe: 537 games, 389 goals, 170 assists → Average goals 0.72 assists 0.32 assists per game, and 1.04 per game

Data screenshot

Club (Click on Germany)

Haland: 332 games, 262 goals, 57 assists → Average goals 0.79, Average assists 0.17, Average production 0.96

Mbappe: 445 games, 337 goals, 132 assists → Average goals 0.76, Average assists 0.30, Average production 1.05

Haland

National Team (Transfer by Germany)

Haland (Norway): 45 games, 48 ​​goals, 6 assists → Average goals 1.07, Average assists 0.13, Average production 1.20

Mbappe (France): 92 games, 52 goals, 38 assists → Average goals 0.57, Average assists 0.41, Average production 0.98

Mbappe

Player evaluation

① Haaland is even more "ruthless" in the goal. The total caliber is 0.92 goals/game, and the national team is 1.07 goals/game, which is a pure blade that is deadly given opportunities. He may not touch too many balls, but he can end the round every time he reaches the point. This stable "harvest" is the scariest of many giants.

② Making this part is even more "complete". The club-level assist is 0.30 and the production is 1.05 per game, which means that you can not only enter, but also feed. The left wing takes the ball and cuts in, passes straight, and follow up twice are all threats. If you want to revive the entire team's offense, look at him first.

③ The national team style enlarges the difference. Norway's configuration is not as luxurious as France, and Haaland can still score 1.20 per game manufacturing, which means he can squeeze out a small number of opportunities; France has more firepower, and Mbappe's responsibility is more like an "engine", with a high assist ratio, and many times he is the one who brings the rhythm up.

④ Effect on different defenses. When playing low positions is dense and requires crossing and two points, Haaland's value is the most intuitive: position, grabbing points, and taking away one set of two opposites. When encountering a transition counterattack, you have to keep your speed full. Mbappe's one-step pass plus the last pass makes it difficult for the opponent to survive.

⑤ "amplifier" for the system and teammates. If the team has high-quality full-back crosses, a second-hand setter in the ribs, and a midfielder who can stuff the ball into the penalty area, Haaland's efficiency can continue to rise; if you want a free agent who can lead by yourself, connect in series, and end, Mbappe's adaptability is wider.

⑥ Conclusion

If you lack "blade", choose Haaland; if you lack "plan", choose Mbappe. The former pulls the goal rate to the ceiling, while the latter pulls the offensive methods to full range. Both of them are so good. It depends on what job your team lacks and what kind of ball the coach wants to play.

Mbappe