19 Russian aircraft were blown up by Poland! Trump replied, Zelensky's tone suddenly changed

This article is only published on today's headlines, reprinting is prohibited

In the early morning of September 10, NATO fighter jets suddenly opened fire, and 19 Russian drones were volleyed in Polish airspace!

The whole world held its breath in an instant. NATO, is it finally going to fight Russia head-on?

Don't worry, things are not that simple.

This is not an ordinary firefight. It is the first time that NATO has launched a live-fire strike on Russian targets on its own member states' territory since the start of the Russian and Ukraine.

The Polish military responded greatly. Prime Minister Tusk directly quoted Article 4 of the North Atlantic Convention and called on allies to hold an emergency meeting, saying that "this is the closest moment to a full-scale conflict since World War II."

Global Network News, the wreckage of Russian aircraft is scattered hundreds of kilometers, and seven drones and one missile component have been confirmed to be found, and the scene is in a mess.

But strangely, NATO did not take advantage of the situation to launch the fifth "collective defense", and the United States only sent F-35 to assist in the interception and did not make any further moves.

What's even more strange is Belarus. As a die-hard ally of Russia, it actually took the initiative to report to Poland and Lithuania at this critical moment, and even helped to shoot down several drones that were yawing.

Which is this singing?

Is it Russia intentionally provoked?

Poland came up with evidence that the "Gerbera" drone was plugged into Polish and Lithuanian SIM cards, relied on local 4G networks for real-time navigation, and also installed additional fuel tanks. It was obviously a prepared "scout swarm" with the purpose of testing NATO radar response and understanding the deployment rules of the F-35.

or has the Ukrainian electronic warfare screwed up?

Belarus hinted that the Russian and Ukrainian drones exchanged fierce fire that night, and the Ukrainian army's strong electronic interference caused a large number of drones to drift out of control. "It was not that the Russian side took the initiative to break in, but that the signal was lost and flew randomly."

If it is really a technical mistake, then this is not a "provocation", but an "accident".

Or is Zelensky "hit" NATO?

After the incident, Zelensky immediately jumped out and accused Russia of "attacking Poland" and strongly demanded a joint counterattack in the West. It is obvious that Zelensky is adding fuel to the fire and wants to take the opportunity to "drag NATO to launch the water". Once NATO launches Article 5, a full-scale war will be equivalent to starting.

But NATO did not accept the challenge this time. Reuters revealed internal news: Anonymous NATO official said, "We don't think this is a Russian attack." shouted loudly and was very honest. No matter how fierce Poland yells, NATO still dares not fight head-on with the nuclear powers.

After the incident, the world is waiting for the United States to react.

Trump didn't post until the night of the 10th: What happened to Russia using drones to invade Polish airspace? Here we go again.

These three words, "Here we go", have fooled everyone, and it can be translated as a good show and we are here, so from the American media to Poland and NATO, they are all guessing what Trump means?

CNN bluntly said it was "confusing". NBC believed that this was Trump's support for Poland. Polish officials said that what they most urgently wanted to know was what Trump's "Here we go" meant?

Some people believe that this is Trump warning Russia that the second round of sanctions will be in place soon, while others think that this is just Trump's helpless sigh at the situation in Russia and Ukraine. After all, although NATO fighter jets participated in the interception, the United States has not activated a collective defense mechanism so far, and its operations are limited to intelligence support and air defense.

While NATO and Russia blame each other and the United States' attitude was unknown, Zelensky suddenly changed his words.

In an exclusive interview, he redefined what "victory" was to reconcile his previous tough stance of "completely regaining all territory". He said: "As long as Russia does not completely occupy Ukraine, Ukraine will not lose."

This statement is worth savoring, because Zelensky's definition of "victory" has been iterated in four versions:

version 1.0, that is, when the war between Russia and Ukraine just started, Zelensky said that it was only a victory to completely drive the Russian army out of Ukraine, including Crimea. This was his toughest period, with the whole nation mobilized and a passionate counterattack.

Version 2.0, in the first half of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, he said that Russia will never recognize the annexation of the four eastern Ukrainian states. The position is still tough, but it has begun to focus on "sovement without concessions" rather than "full recovery".

version 3.0, which was at the beginning of last year, Zelensky said that in terms of law, Russia will never recognize the sovereignty of the region. This is actually accustomed to the actual control of Russia, but retaining the right to legal recourse can already clearly see his retreat.

Now, version 4.0 is quietly launched: "If you are not completely occupied, you will win."

What does it mean? Translated into plain language: Ukraine no longer pursues regaining all land. As long as the Kiev regime is still there and the country has not been erased from the map, it can be declared "we won."

This is not a tactical adjustment at all, but a complete subversion of strategic cognition. Why did Zelensky suddenly change his words at this time?

First, military aid was cut off and the blood trough was empty.

The word Ukraine is most afraid of hearing recently is "discontinuation of aid". Trump directly disguised himself as a result of military aid to Ukraine, and threw all the pressure to Europe, but the problem is that Europe itself is difficult to protect itself and the EU is in chaos. Now the distribution of artillery shells for Ukrainian frontline soldiers has been reduced from 10 rounds a day to 3 rounds, and even troops that "can only fire one shot per week" have appeared. Russia has launched a wartime economy, and its shell production is three times that of the total aid to Ukraine in Europe and the United States. A counterattack without ammunition is called death.

Second, Trump's "disappointment" has a profound meaning.

After Russia's massive air strike against Kiev last week, Trump publicly said he was "disappointed with Putin." Many people think he is condemning the atrocities, but in fact he has completely misunderstood the point. Trump was disappointed that "Putin has not settled the armistice negotiations yet", rather than "Why Putin bombed Ukraine again", Zelensky could not understand this signal.

Thirdly, Ukrainian society has reached its limit.

To this day, Ukrainian soldiers have been exhausted, the economy has collapsed, and the refugees have been outflowed. Recently, the Ukrainian military was exposed to large-scale arrests on the streets in order to gather troops, and the people also took the initiative to provide coordinates for the Russian army to bomb the conscription. It can be said that the war-weariness in Ukraine has reached the critical point, and it is almost impossible for Zelensky to achieve a "counterattack miracle".

So Zelensky said that these are sending outward ceasefire signals. What he needs to do now is to find a decent way to end the game, both explaining to the domestic market and paving the way for negotiations.